What distinguishes "gross negligence" from simple negligence?

Gross negligence is recognized as a more severe form of negligence that involves a significant departure from the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise. It is characterized by a blatant disregard for the safety and wellbeing of others, demonstrating a lack of concern that can be likened to intentional harm. This includes instances where an individual's actions reflect a substantial deviation from what could be considered a minimally acceptable standard of care.

The correct choice focuses on the aspect of malicious intent and willful disregard for safety, highlighting the intentional nature of gross negligence. This intent implies that the individual not only acted carelessly but that their conduct exhibited an extreme disregard for the potential consequences that their actions may have on others. Such behavior is markedly different from simple negligence, which may involve a failure to act with reasonable care but does not include the same level of egregiousness or intent.

In contrast, lack of training does not inherently denote gross negligence; rather, it might simply reflect a void of knowledge or skills that could lead to a less severe form of negligence. Actions taken without intention could correspond to either simple negligence or gross negligence, depending on the context, but do not alone define gross negligence. Lastly, cancelled calls do not pertain to the concept of negligence at all, as